Project Smart ~ Exploring trends and developments in project management today

Calendar icon
Adobe PDF icon

The Project Go/No-Go Checklist

~ By James W.J. Hutt

Checklist

Many projects have failed at the last hurdle due to poor implementation planning or inadequate analysis immediately prior to go-live. It is the project manager's responsibility to ensure that the implementation has been planned out and communicated to stakeholders, and that sufficient due diligence is undertaken before the project proceeds. This second point is often overlooked. Many project managers put together some form of implementation or cutover plan yet fail to carry out the necessary rigorous analysis to determine whether they should proceed. This article focuses on this analysis - what is termed the 'go-live decision'.

The decision to go-live or not should not be taken lightly; it is without doubt one of the most important decisions in the project lifecycle and getting it wrong can jeopardise the success of the entire project.

Going-live without everything in place may result in:

  • Unresolved defects
  • Inadequate testing
  • Insufficient training
  • Business processes not understood
  • Procedures not written
  • Stakeholders missed
  • Lack of communications
  • Data migration failure
  • Interfaces not working
  • System administration and support not in place
  • Business areas not ready for the changes
  • No contingencies in place
  • Workflows and exceptions not mapped out
  • No backups and disaster recovery in place
  • Inadequate system security
  • Unclear responsibilities, accountabilities and ownership
  • Inadequate implementation strategy

And ultimately…

  • System/application failure
  • Impact to the business/organisation
  • Project failure

Whilst the project manager is always under pressure to deliver within schedule, sometimes it is prudent for them to step back and delay go-live rather than risk the consequences of steaming ahead.

What due diligence needs to be done?

Ideally the project should secure an independent resource to perform the readiness assessment. If the analysis is undertaken by the project manager, or people closely associated with the project, there is a risk of bias or influence from the pressure to implement on time. Using an independent resource provides a level of impartiality and therefore credibility to the decision making process. It is also useful to get an outsider's perspective, especially if it's from someone with years of project experience and knowledge. Well funded projects often employ outside consultants to perform audits and health checks throughout the project lifecycle, including the go-live readiness assessments.

Unfortunately not all projects have the means or desire to employ consultants, and therefore need to utilise internal staff. In this case it's best to use a resource with prior project experience (e.g. another project manager), but with no vested interest in the outcome of the project. This improves the chances of an objective outcome and recommendations. Remember, it is in the project manager's interests to get an honest assessment of where the project is really at, as any major deficiencies must be either addressed or mitigated against before go-live. If the outcome of the assessment is pre-determined or intentionally slanted, there is little point in doing the assessment!

If it's not possible to secure an independent internal resource to carry out the readiness assessment, the project manager can do it themselves. However they need to make sure that they give an honest account of the situation, ask searching questions of people and don't hide issues. These assessments should never be conducted without extensive consultation, as it's vital to speak to as many project people as possible to find out the true state of play. Some people may hide issues or only tell you the positives. It's important to get the 'warts and all' view, as any major issues and roadblocks must be uncovered and addressed before a decision is made.

Go/No-Go Checklist

What should the assessment cover? Rather than starting from scratch, it's easier to use a Go/No-Go checklist. This provides a starting place, based upon common best practice, and ensures that you won't miss any key areas in your review. Use what's in the checklist to prompt other questions and checks that may be relevant to the project.

The project does not have to tick all of the boxes to proceed, and there is no required score or pass/fail mark. However, if there are several glaring gaps the decision becomes fairly obvious. The checklist helps to identify serious gaps and deficiencies to be addressed before go-live. It may also provide support for further funds or resources if a particular area needs addressing. The checklist should support the decision making process, rather than form the basis of a decision. Whoever makes the decision (normally a steering committee) must also consider the bigger picture and include other factors such as external pressures, urgency to proceed, appetite for risk, consequences of delays, etc.

If significant gaps are identified, it is usually far better for all concerned to delay implementation until these gaps have been addressed/mitigated. The implications and costs of a failed or troublesome go-live are often far worse than a minor delay in the schedule. The only exception to this is if there is a non-negotiable implementation date (e.g. a response to legislation changes that have to be in by a certain date). In this case the gaps on the checklist should be prioritised and addressed in order of importance and ability to resolve. In this case by going-live the steering committee would essentially be accepting the risks identified in the assessment, on the basis that meeting the implementation date is more important than mitigating the risks and having a smooth go-live.


Comments (5)

Topic: The Project Go/No-Go Checklist
3/5 (5)
Gravatar
Full StarFull StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty Star
30th September 2020 5:21pm
Jeannine Rutledge (Burnham) says...
Most arriving at this article have some level of knowledge stated in the article. I'm sure we were all seeking the same outcome. The obvious is clearly true; what this author has done is cleverly titled an article not truly worth reading, obtained the hits, and reads required and most are none the wiser. Well played blogger of no substances, well played.
Gravatar
Full StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty Star
11th April 2019 1:20pm
Ricky (London) says...
Not very useful - statements of the obvious without actually providing the very thing meant to save the project.
Gravatar
Full StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty Star
15th January 2019 11:13pm
Kartik Narayan (London) says...
This article is titled Go/No Go Checklist, but doesn't have a checklist! Waste of time. Any manager with an iota of experience and basic common sense will of course know that there should be a checklist of sorts. Completely useless article to be honest.
Gravatar
Full StarFull StarFull StarFull StarEmpty Star
22nd February 2019 2:55pm
Duncan Haughey (London) says...
I'm not sure it is possible to have a one-size-fits-all project checklist. The authors' intention is to explore the benefits of using a checklist as part of a readiness assessment and go-live decision.

I take the point that an example checklist would have been helpful.
Gravatar
Full StarFull StarFull StarFull StarFull Star
1st February 2018 2:22pm
DA Fair (Lansing) says...
Very helpful article on Go/No-Go Checklist. It is an important exercise I've done in the past, but I like the idea of a 3rd party running through the checklist.

Add a comment



(never displayed)



 
2000
Which is darker: black or white?
Notify me of new comments via email.
Remember my form inputs on this computer.

Tracking a Risk

Dial showing three levels of risk management

Risk management is a vital part of project management. Learn four key steps to help you evaluate and mitigate any risks on your project.

Developing the Project Plan

Project planning document being annotated

It is completely possible to run a project without a project plan or timeline; it's just not very smart.

Stealth Team Building

Four jigsaw puzzle pieces on the topic of team building

The effective project manager takes advantage of every opportunity the team gets together to develop team synergy.

12 Tips for Accurate Project Estimating

Money and a calculator

Using a set of proactive estimating techniques to scope, plan and constrain your project conditions can dramatically improve your estimating practices.

PROJECT SMART is the project management resource that helps managers at all levels improve their performance. We provide an important knowledge base for those involved in managing projects of all kinds. With weekly exclusive updates, we keep you in touch with the latest project management thinking.

WE ARE CONNECTED ~ Follow us on social media to get regular updates and opinion on what's happening in the world of project management.


Latest Comments

Duncan Haughey commented on…
Psychology for Project Managers
- Thu 22 October 5:10pm

Michael Fayamba commented on…
RACI Matrix
- Sun 18 October 6:34pm

Muhammed Ayub commented on…
Understanding the Project Management Triple Constraint
- Fri 9 October 8:54am

Latest tweets

General Project Management • Job opportunities as you get older https://t.co/wEbf7foa16 about 1 day ago

General Project Management • Re: Why is it important to develop a product-thinking mindset? https://t.co/jcA2QT4laM about 2 days ago

General Project Management • Why is it important to develop a product-thinking mindset? https://t.co/IUW782zrve about 2 days ago