Project Smart ~ Exploring trends and developments in project management today

Calendar icon
Adobe PDF icon

The Project Go/No-Go Checklist

~ By James W.J. Hutt

Checklist

Many projects have failed at the last hurdle due to poor implementation planning or inadequate analysis immediately prior to go-live. It is the project manager's responsibility to ensure that the implementation has been planned out and communicated to stakeholders, and that sufficient due diligence is undertaken before the project proceeds. This second point is often overlooked. Many project managers put together some form of implementation or cutover plan yet fail to carry out the necessary rigorous analysis to determine whether they should proceed. This article focuses on this analysis - what is termed the 'go-live decision'.

The decision to go-live or not should not be taken lightly; it is without doubt one of the most important decisions in the project lifecycle and getting it wrong can jeopardise the success of the entire project.

Going-live without everything in place may result in:

  • Unresolved defects
  • Inadequate testing
  • Insufficient training
  • Business processes not understood
  • Procedures not written
  • Stakeholders missed
  • Lack of communications
  • Data migration failure
  • Interfaces not working
  • System administration and support not in place
  • Business areas not ready for the changes
  • No contingencies in place
  • Workflows and exceptions not mapped out
  • No backups and disaster recovery in place
  • Inadequate system security
  • Unclear responsibilities, accountabilities and ownership
  • Inadequate implementation strategy

And ultimately…

  • System/application failure
  • Impact to the business/organisation
  • Project failure

Whilst the project manager is always under pressure to deliver within schedule, sometimes it is prudent for them to step back and delay go-live rather than risk the consequences of steaming ahead.

What due diligence needs to be done?

Ideally the project should secure an independent resource to perform the readiness assessment. If the analysis is undertaken by the project manager, or people closely associated with the project, there is a risk of bias or influence from the pressure to implement on time. Using an independent resource provides a level of impartiality and therefore credibility to the decision making process. It is also useful to get an outsider's perspective, especially if it's from someone with years of project experience and knowledge. Well funded projects often employ outside consultants to perform audits and health checks throughout the project lifecycle, including the go-live readiness assessments.

Unfortunately not all projects have the means or desire to employ consultants, and therefore need to utilise internal staff. In this case it's best to use a resource with prior project experience (e.g. another project manager), but with no vested interest in the outcome of the project. This improves the chances of an objective outcome and recommendations. Remember, it is in the project manager's interests to get an honest assessment of where the project is really at, as any major deficiencies must be either addressed or mitigated against before go-live. If the outcome of the assessment is pre-determined or intentionally slanted, there is little point in doing the assessment!

If it's not possible to secure an independent internal resource to carry out the readiness assessment, the project manager can do it themselves. However they need to make sure that they give an honest account of the situation, ask searching questions of people and don't hide issues. These assessments should never be conducted without extensive consultation, as it's vital to speak to as many project people as possible to find out the true state of play. Some people may hide issues or only tell you the positives. It's important to get the 'warts and all' view, as any major issues and roadblocks must be uncovered and addressed before a decision is made.

Go/No-Go Checklist

What should the assessment cover? Rather than starting from scratch, it's easier to use a Go/No-Go checklist. This provides a starting place, based upon common best practice, and ensures that you won't miss any key areas in your review. Use what's in the checklist to prompt other questions and checks that may be relevant to the project.

The project does not have to tick all of the boxes to proceed, and there is no required score or pass/fail mark. However, if there are several glaring gaps the decision becomes fairly obvious. The checklist helps to identify serious gaps and deficiencies to be addressed before go-live. It may also provide support for further funds or resources if a particular area needs addressing. The checklist should support the decision making process, rather than form the basis of a decision. Whoever makes the decision (normally a steering committee) must also consider the bigger picture and include other factors such as external pressures, urgency to proceed, appetite for risk, consequences of delays, etc.

If significant gaps are identified, it is usually far better for all concerned to delay implementation until these gaps have been addressed/mitigated. The implications and costs of a failed or troublesome go-live are often far worse than a minor delay in the schedule. The only exception to this is if there is a non-negotiable implementation date (e.g. a response to legislation changes that have to be in by a certain date). In this case the gaps on the checklist should be prioritised and addressed in order of importance and ability to resolve. In this case by going-live the steering committee would essentially be accepting the risks identified in the assessment, on the basis that meeting the implementation date is more important than mitigating the risks and having a smooth go-live.


Comments

Be the first to comment on this article.

Add a comment



(never displayed)



 
1500
What is the opposite word of small?
Notify me of new comments via email.
Remember my form inputs on this computer.

10 Golden Rules of Project Risk Management

Three red dice reading: Manage your risk

The benefits of risk management in projects are huge. You can gain a lot of money if you deal with uncertain project events in a proactive manner.

Project Planning a Step by Step Guide

Businessman finding the solution to a maze

The key to a successful project is in the planning. Creating a project plan is the first thing you should do when undertaking any kind of project.

Resolving Project Team Conflicts

Two women having an argument in an office

Conflicts on project teams are a fact of life! Only on rare occasions do conflicts not arise. As project manager you must manage these conflicts.

A Brief History of SMART Goals

Set your goals written on blue paper

In this history of SMART goals, I look at where the acronym came from, who developed it, what the critics say and why it has become popular.

PROJECT SMART is the project management resource that helps managers at all levels improve their performance. We provide an important knowledge base for those involved in managing projects of all kinds. With weekly exclusive updates, we keep you in touch with the latest project management thinking.

WE ARE CONNECTED ~ Follow us on social media to get regular updates and opinion on what's happening in the world of project management.


Latest Comments

Idris Sabo Inuwa commented on…
SMART Goals
- Tue 14 June 12:49pm

Jacie Thompson commented on…
Project Scheduling And Resource Levelling
- Tue 14 June 12:28am

Safdar commented on…
RAID Log
- Wed 8 June 3:14pm

Latest tweets

General Project Management • Re: Project and Process Tailoring for the PMP Exam https://t.co/PWGX9uMnUt #pm #projectsmart about 4 days ago

General Project Management • Re: Survey about IT PM methodologies for my bachelor's thesis https://t.co/652zR7UZJf #pm #projectsmart about 4 days ago

General Project Management • Re: Masters Survey-Need your participation. Just 5 minutes https://t.co/QWtO5ifzcw #pm #projectsmart about 7 days ago