Project Smart ~ Exploring trends and developments in project management today

Calendar iconNot recorded
Adobe PDF icon

Successful Innovation: How to Manage Product Misses to Maximise Hits

~ By Carl Cullotta

Innovation symbol on a concrete wall background

Most companies in the innovation game can proudly point to their winners, those new products/services that launched successfully and exceeded expectations for revenue/profit/market share. However, those same companies often express frustration or dissatisfaction with their overall return on innovation investment.

We see three common issues that create dissatisfaction, says Vice President and Principal of Frank Lynn & Associates Inc., metrics, project initiation and the innovation process.

Smart Business asked to share some lessons learned from the firm's experience.

Why Do Even the Leading Innovators Express Frustration With the Process?

Inappropriate metrics result in misplaced expectations. Even the most successful innovators should expect fewer "hits" than "misses." Misguided project initiation clogs the development pipeline with so many low-probability projects that the winners can't be funded properly. And poor process management sustains the ultimate losing bets in the pipeline for too long.

You Mentioned Metrics. What Are the Most Appropriate Metrics for the Development Process?

Most companies measure innovation based on the outputs. For example, a common benchmark demands that 20 percent of company revenues are generated from products/services launched in the last three to five years. This does not measure the effectiveness of the innovation process. (Even the poorest process can meet this revenue goal if enough resources are thrown at it).

The most effective metrics provide actionable insights to the process of innovation.

Revenue return/dollars invested. This measure provides an indicator as to how well you are allocating resources. Actions derived from this metric could include a change in the project staffing model or changes to the timing of the hard costs (patent application, field tests, etc.). to help lower overall project costs without affecting positive outcomes.

Average number of projects/innovation employee. Often, so many development projects are started that the staff cannot devote sufficient resources to any to effectively move them forward. "Addition by subtraction" can result by limiting, or even capping, the number of development projects allowed in the pipeline at any time.

Average project duration. Companies that struggle with innovation have trouble saying no. The pipeline is clogged with too many projects, and the best-bet opportunities cannot receive the critical mass of resources they require to move forward. Even a goal to decrease average project duration by 10 percent will result in quicker go/no-go decisions and better overall resource utilisation.

What Is the Best Way to Initiate Projects?

Historically, companies tended to take an inside-out approach to innovation (i.e., "let the inventors invent"). The result was that the vast majority of projects had little direct relation to a market need. As the "market driven" buzzword took hold, many companies moved to the other extreme. Every development project had to have justification from the marketplace. This approach lost the "quantum-leap" advances; too many projects resulted in small incremental improvements in features/benefits.

The most appropriate approach is a combination of the above extremes. We use a benchmark of 75/25: 75 percent of the projects initiated should be market driven, targeted from the outset to deliver a specific benefit to a specific market segment. The remaining 25 percent are less constrained. The inventors are allowed to invent and look for those quantum-leap advances.

What Improvements to the Innovation Process Itself Would You Suggest?

A world-class innovation process requires disciplined management by using the stage-gate process. Development projects are managed through a series of stages. Each stage culminates in a review and go/no-go decision. Only those projects that pass through this gate are funded to the next stage.

While the concept of a stage-gate process is easy to envision, what separates the successful innovators from the rest is the set of inputs used at each stage. Assessment of both technical and market feasibility are intertwined. At each review, a progressively tougher set of criteria assure the product/service can be scaled up to support commercialisation, and the market opportunity is there to profitably launch and commercialise the innovation.

What Does It Mean for the Company Trying to Improve Its Return on the Innovation Dollar?

If we look at the big picture, we find that the most successful innovators understand the importance of managing the process. These companies understand the importance of process-oriented metrics. They are driven to initiate projects primarily from the "outside in." And they are disciplined in managing the low probability opportunities out of the pipeline as soon as possible.


Carl Cullotta, Vice President and Principal of Frank Lynn & Associates directs the firm's building and construction practice group. He has managed numerous engagements with global companies during his 22 years with the firm.


Advertisement


Comments

Be the first to comment on this article.

Add a comment



(never displayed)



 
2000
What is the month after June?
Notify me of new comments via email.
Remember my form inputs on this computer.

Top Three Causes of Project Failure

Businessman in a black suit holding up a white sign reading failed

The top three causes of project failure, which if addressed will greatly increase the chances of project success.

Coming to Terms With the Finish Date

Colourful calendar pages

Every project has a finish date. This article looks at how the finish date for a project is derived and how a project team comes to terms with that date.

Resolving Project Team Conflicts

Two women having an argument in an office

Conflicts on project teams are a fact of life! Only on rare occasions do conflicts not arise. As project manager you must manage these conflicts.

Undertaking a Successful Project Audit

Audit checklist clipboard with checkboxes marked for related concepts

A project audit provides an opportunity to uncover issues, concerns and challenges encountered during the project lifecycle.

PROJECT SMART is the project management resource that helps managers at all levels improve their performance. We provide an important knowledge base for those involved in managing projects of all kinds. With weekly exclusive updates, we keep you in touch with the latest project management thinking.

WE ARE CONNECTED ~ Follow us on social media to get regular updates and opinion on what's happening in the world of project management.


Latest Comments

Arthur commented on…
Make Me a Project Manager in 2018
- Tue 16 January 12:24pm

Suzanne commented on…
The Role of the Project Manager
- Thu 11 January 9:29pm

David commented on…
Project Plans: 10 Essential Elements
- Mon 11 December 10:51pm

Latest tweets

General Project Management • Benefits Help https://t.co/WFZfGrXigf #projectsmart #pmot about 9 days ago

General Project Management • Re: Which project management software? https://t.co/kWXTIQMin4 #projectsmart #pmot about 13 days ago

General Project Management • Re: Project management software for personal use? https://t.co/LaLlQ8n9b8 #projectsmart #pmot about 13 days ago