Project Smart ~ Exploring trends and developments in project management today

Calendar iconNot recorded
Adobe PDF icon

MoSCoW Method

~ By Duncan Haughey

MoSCoW written on a blackboard

When managing a project, it is important to develop a clear understanding of the customers' requirements and their priority. Many projects start with the barest headline list of requirements, only to find later the customers' needs have not been fully understood.

Once there is a clear set of requirements, it is important to rank them. This ranking helps everyone (customer, project manager, designer, developers) understand the most important requirements, in what order to develop them, and what not to deliver if there is pressure on resources.

So what is the best method for creating a prioritised list of requirements?

The MoSCoW method can help. MoSCoW stands for must, should, could and would:

  • M - Must have this requirement to meet the business needs
  • S - Should have this requirement if possible, but project success does not rely on it
  • C - Could have this requirement if it does not affect anything else on the project
  • W - Would like to have this requirement later, but delivery won't be this time

The o's in MoSCoW are added to make the acronym pronounceable and are often in lowercase to show they don't stand for anything.

MoSCoW as a prioritisation method is used to decide which requirements to complete first, which must come later and which to exclude.

Unlike a numbering system for setting priorities, the words mean something and make it easier to discuss what's important. The must requirements need to provide a coherent solution, and alone lead to project success.

The must requirements are non-negotiable. Failure to deliver even one of them will likely mean the project has failed.

The project team should aim to deliver as many of the should requirements as possible. Could and would requirements are nice to have and do not affect the overall success of the project. Could requirements are the first to go if the project timeline or budget comes under pressure.

It is essential to have a clear set of prioritised and agreed requirements with the customer, alongside the overall objective, quality criteria, timescale and budget if you are going to deliver a successful project. The recommended method for setting priorities is MoSCoW.


MoSCoW was developed by Dai Clegg of Oracle UK in 1994 and has been made popular by exponents of the Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM).


Comments (9)

Topic: MoSCoW Method
5/5 (8)
Gravatar
Full StarFull StarFull StarFull StarEmpty Star
8th September 2015 11:44pm
Nitin Jain (London) says...
Great method. Thanks for explaining it so well here. Would vs Won't debate is not relevant. However, a practical consideration is the inability to sort out the list based on this classification in Excel or any other request tracking system as MoSCoW does not appear alphabetically. Any suggestions for the same? We can do 1-Must, 2-Should, 3-Could, 4-Won't, but that defeats the purpose to some extent.
Gravatar
8th September 2014 6:00pm
Nicole Yaniz (Mokena) says...
Does anyone have a good template they use?
Gravatar
Full StarFull StarFull StarEmpty StarEmpty Star
22nd July 2014 1:54am
Chu (Yangon) says...
Please explain to me about W. It is won't or want. In my first textbook (Agile), it is named as Won't. It is named as Want in Database Frameworks and method.
Gravatar
Full StarFull StarFull StarFull StarFull Star
25th July 2014 8:50am
Duncan Haughey (London) says...
I don't think it really matters whether it is Won't or Want as long as the intent is clear. It is not worth debating which it should be. Won't, want and would are all used and quoted depending on where you look. Personally, I like would, as in, "I would like to have this requirement, but will leave it out this time for consideration at a later date".
Gravatar
Full StarFull StarFull StarFull StarFull Star
21st June 2014 3:53pm
Christina (Athens) says...
Just a point. For the prioritization that involves 3rd party priorities (regulation, legislation) I use "Ought" as well.
Gravatar
Full StarFull StarFull StarFull StarFull Star
18th June 2014 9:39pm
Dan Brenner (Lakewood) says...
The PMBOK has not defined this anywhere, and it isn't in the PMI lexicon either.
  • Must, Should, Could, Would is the "all positive" project manager.
  • Must, Should, Can't, Won't is the "all negative" project manager.
  • Must, Should, Could, Won't is the "balanced" project manager.
I prefer the balanced approach as it allows you to define some things that have been defined as 'out of scope', while still giving a middle ground of things that you could decide to include in the project.
Gravatar
Full StarFull StarFull StarFull StarEmpty Star
18th June 2014 8:33pm
Yaroslav (Slavutich) says...
"W" does not mean "Would", it means "Won't" this is confused.
Gravatar
Full StarFull StarFull StarFull StarFull Star
18th June 2014 9:32pm
Duncan Haughey (London) says...
I'm not sure won't is correct either. I believe the definitive definition is:

'Want to have but will not have this time round'.

This is applied to those requirements that can wait until later development takes place.

Whether you use would, won't or want - these requirements aren't going to be delivered this time round.
Gravatar
Full StarFull StarFull StarFull StarFull Star
21st June 2014 6:00pm
Shilpa Adavelli (Chicago) says...
For requirements prioritization, BABOK says 'W' is for 'Won't', not 'Would' or 'Want' but not necessarily everybody follows the BABOK, so I guess 'Would' would work for some organizations. As long as it is clearly defined what the expectation is and what 'W' stands for, I don't think it's an issue.

Add a comment



(never displayed)



 
2000
Out of 90, 76 or 12, which is the largest?
Notify me of new comments via email.
Remember my form inputs on this computer.

Building a Business Case for Your Project

Ball of business documents

To get stakeholders or management to approve your project, you will need to build a solid business case. Here are the basic steps for creating a business case.

Work Breakdown Structure Made Easy

Work Breakdown Structure

The Work Breakdown Structure is a deliverable-oriented, hierarchical decomposition of the work to be completed by a project team.

Belbin and Successful Project Teams

Business team brainstorming using coloured labels on an office table

Creating successful project teams is a daunting task for project leaders. A good method for matching people to roles is the Belbin Team Inventory Method (BTIM).

The Simplified Project Management Process

Flat design of project management with icons

A five-minute step by step explanation of what project management involves for people who are unfamiliar with the approach.

PROJECT SMART is the project management resource that helps managers at all levels improve their performance. We provide an important knowledge base for those involved in managing projects of all kinds. With weekly exclusive updates, we keep you in touch with the latest project management thinking.

WE ARE CONNECTED ~ Follow us on social media to get regular updates and opinion on what's happening in the world of project management.


Latest Comments

Megan Wale commented on…
Six Time Management Tips for Project Managers - Infographic
- Fri 17 November 11:03am

Jo commented on…
How to Report Status on a Project
- Mon 6 November 12:54pm

Duncan Haughey commented on…
Project Management Checklists
- Mon 30 October 4:59pm

Latest tweets

General Project Management • Re: Project management software for personal use? https://t.co/Y1cMtVnxax #projectsmart #pmot about 1 day ago

General Project Management • Project management software for personal use? https://t.co/G1cG9ZcUZE #projectsmart #pmot about 1 day ago

General Project Management • Re: Online PM Tools https://t.co/xACuaSLaDo #projectsmart #pmot about 1 day ago