Project Smart ~ Exploring trends and developments in project management today

Calendar icon
Adobe PDF icon

5 Reasons to Kill IT Projects

~ By Michael Krigsman

Furious businessman tearing up a document

A survey of IT experts revealed 43 percent of their organisations had recently killed an IT project. The study, conducted by ISACA, an independent IT governance group, highlighted the top 5 reasons these organisations named for terminating projects prior to completion.

Here's the list, with my commentary on each issue:

1. Business Needs Changed: 30%

There are many conditions and situations where a business legitimately changes its requirements after starting a project. If the project no longer provides meaningful value, then it's best to stop throwing good money after bad.

On the other hand, some organisations deliberately obscure a flawed project requirements process by claiming business needs evolved. Obviously, that's unhealthy and a true sign of failure.

2. Did Not Deliver as Promised: 23%

This is a typical expectation setting problem: promise anything to get funding and worry about the consequences later. Shortsighted managers don't realise that funding is less important than delivering substantive value. Failure is inevitable when managers don't clearly identify and deliver business value.

In some cases, the project really did provide value, which the organisation did not recognise due to communication problems. I recently blogged about one CIO seeking a publicist, presumably to address this issue:

Many organisations take a CIO for granted when his IT department consistently delivers the goods without fanfare and attention; sadly, this human failing is all too common. In that case, PR might be a great idea, especially if the CIO isn't a great communicator. Of course, the CIO should improve his communication skills, but that's another story.

3. Project Was No Longer a Priority: 14%

If the organisation shifted direction without good reason, thus making the project superfluous, then flawed strategic planning was the culprit. However, if business requirements changed for a good reason, as suggested in point one, there's not necessarily a problem.

In general, and this is an obvious point, cancelling projects without a darn good reason is a definite sign of failure.

4. Project Exceeded the Budget: 13%

On the surface, over-budget projects are the basic metric for failure. I'm actually surprised this number isn't higher, because unanticipated cost is always such a clear red flag.

At the same time, some projects run over-budget due to intelligent scope increases that provide additional value. For example, while automating two departments, the project team realises it can add a third department for only marginal increases in cost. In such cases, going forward is probably the right decision despite the higher spend.

Although tempting to use budget performance as simple metric of success or failure, that approach can be overly simplistic and ignore important nuances related to business value. Nonetheless, anytime a project goes over-budget the team must offer a detailed explanation.

5. Project Did Not Support the Business Strategy: 7%

This classic indicator of failure often suggests a project rooted in poor requirements analysis. However, as with previous points, it's also possible changing business needs made the original project goals obsolete.

The survey is most interesting to highlight significant issues related to project failure. However, some of the questions are too ambiguous to provide straightforward conclusions. In general, understanding whether a project is successful requires examining the business environment and context.


Michael Krigsman is CEO of Michael Krigsman, a software and consulting company dedicated to reducing software implementation failures. Asuret's suite of software tools improve the success rate of enterprise software deployments by quantifying and measuring the grey, non-technical risks and complexity that cause most implementation failures. Michael led the research effort underlying Asuret's model of risk factors that typically contribute to project failures. Michael consults to software companies and IT departments on topics related to improving software implementations. Michael blogs about his project management experiences at IT Project Failures


Comments

Be the first to comment on this article.

Add a comment



(never displayed)



 
2000
What is the month after April?
Notify me of new comments via email.
Remember my form inputs on this computer.

My Story: Working Smarter; Not Harder

Woman thinking with a light bulb drawn on a blackboard

When you realise that you have the power to change your beliefs and remove a limiting factor that has been constraining you, you have an AHA! moment.

Coming to Terms With the Finish Date

Colourful calendar pages

Every project has a finish date. This article looks at how the finish date for a project is derived and how a project team comes to terms with that date.

Break Your PMP Studies Into Small Pieces

A mature student concentrating on her studies

Taking the PMP exam is one of the biggest steps you'll take in your career as a Project Manager. With careful planning you can pass with a minimum of stress.

Which Life Cycle Is Best for Your Project?

Life cycle written on digital touch screen

When choosing a development life cycle, don't just trust your feelings. Decide based on factors that really matter.

PROJECT SMART is the project management resource that helps managers at all levels improve their performance. We provide an important knowledge base for those involved in managing projects of all kinds. With weekly exclusive updates, we keep you in touch with the latest project management thinking.

WE ARE CONNECTED ~ Follow us on social media to get regular updates and opinion on what's happening in the world of project management.


Latest Comments

Duncan Haughey commented on…
SWOT Analysis
- Fri 6 April 7:24am

Dr Robert G. Brown commented on…
Four Stages to Project Risk Removal
- Sat 24 March 3:58pm

Almesh commented on…
Work Breakdown Structure 101
- Wed 21 March 5:46am

Latest tweets

General Project Management • Influence of management corrective actions on project control and forecasting https://t.co/BfeA9LKdBM about 2 days ago

General Project Management • Recently passed the PMP exam. Read my story https://t.co/rOe4P6if4Z about 7 days ago

General Project Management • Re: Business Case and Vendor Selection https://t.co/bMV6MMoG36 about 7 days ago