Project Smart ~ Exploring trends and developments in project management today

Calendar icon
Adobe PDF icon

5 Reasons to Kill IT Projects

~ By Michael Krigsman

Furious businessman tearing up a document

A survey of IT experts revealed 43 percent of their organisations had recently killed an IT project. The study, conducted by ISACA, an independent IT governance group, highlighted the top 5 reasons these organisations named for terminating projects prior to completion.

Here's the list, with my commentary on each issue:

1. Business Needs Changed: 30%

There are many conditions and situations where a business legitimately changes its requirements after starting a project. If the project no longer provides meaningful value, then it's best to stop throwing good money after bad.

On the other hand, some organisations deliberately obscure a flawed project requirements process by claiming business needs evolved. Obviously, that's unhealthy and a true sign of failure.

2. Did Not Deliver as Promised: 23%

This is a typical expectation setting problem: promise anything to get funding and worry about the consequences later. Shortsighted managers don't realise that funding is less important than delivering substantive value. Failure is inevitable when managers don't clearly identify and deliver business value.

In some cases, the project really did provide value, which the organisation did not recognise due to communication problems. I recently blogged about one CIO seeking a publicist, presumably to address this issue:

Many organisations take a CIO for granted when his IT department consistently delivers the goods without fanfare and attention; sadly, this human failing is all too common. In that case, PR might be a great idea, especially if the CIO isn't a great communicator. Of course, the CIO should improve his communication skills, but that's another story.

3. Project Was No Longer a Priority: 14%

If the organisation shifted direction without good reason, thus making the project superfluous, then flawed strategic planning was the culprit. However, if business requirements changed for a good reason, as suggested in point one, there's not necessarily a problem.

In general, and this is an obvious point, cancelling projects without a darn good reason is a definite sign of failure.

4. Project Exceeded the Budget: 13%

On the surface, over-budget projects are the basic metric for failure. I'm actually surprised this number isn't higher, because unanticipated cost is always such a clear red flag.

At the same time, some projects run over-budget due to intelligent scope increases that provide additional value. For example, while automating two departments, the project team realises it can add a third department for only marginal increases in cost. In such cases, going forward is probably the right decision despite the higher spend.

Although tempting to use budget performance as simple metric of success or failure, that approach can be overly simplistic and ignore important nuances related to business value. Nonetheless, anytime a project goes over-budget the team must offer a detailed explanation.

5. Project Did Not Support the Business Strategy: 7%

This classic indicator of failure often suggests a project rooted in poor requirements analysis. However, as with previous points, it's also possible changing business needs made the original project goals obsolete.

The survey is most interesting to highlight significant issues related to project failure. However, some of the questions are too ambiguous to provide straightforward conclusions. In general, understanding whether a project is successful requires examining the business environment and context.


Michael Krigsman is CEO of Michael Krigsman, a software and consulting company dedicated to reducing software implementation failures. Asuret's suite of software tools improve the success rate of enterprise software deployments by quantifying and measuring the grey, non-technical risks and complexity that cause most implementation failures. Michael led the research effort underlying Asuret's model of risk factors that typically contribute to project failures. Michael consults to software companies and IT departments on topics related to improving software implementations. Michael blogs about his project management experiences at IT Project Failures


Comments

Be the first to comment on this article.

Add a comment



(never displayed)



 
1500
What is the sum of 1 + 2 + 3?
Notify me of new comments via email.
Remember my form inputs on this computer.

So You Want to Be a Project Manager

Businessman smiling with hands together

Not sure what skills it takes to become a Project Manager? This article lists the six key skills required to be a successful project manager.

Project Plans: 10 Essential Elements

Four colourful tags spelling the word plan

A project plan is more than just a Gantt chart, but do you know what you must have in your plan? This article takes you through the ten essential elements.

Authority Earned, Not Given

Group of business people looking and pointing at a chart

For project managers, the support of their team is critical for completing projects successfully. Yet, a team's respect cannot simply be assigned like a task.

A Brief History of SMART Goals

Set your goals written on blue paper

In this history of SMART goals, I look at where the acronym came from, who developed it, what the critics say and why it has become popular.

PROJECT SMART is the project management resource that helps managers at all levels improve their performance. We provide an important knowledge base for those involved in managing projects of all kinds. With weekly exclusive updates, we keep you in touch with the latest project management thinking.

WE ARE CONNECTED ~ Follow us on social media to get regular updates and opinion on what's happening in the world of project management.


Latest Comments

John Corbett commented on…
10 Rules of Highly Successful Project Management
- Mon 19 September 1:36pm

London Management Centre commented on…
Get Maximum Benefits of Merging Top-down and Bottom-up Project Management
- Mon 19 September 11:29am

Mikey commented on…
PMP vs. PRINCE2 Certificates
- Tue 13 September 2:24am

Latest tweets

General Project Management • Re: PRINCE2 Agile!! Recommended or Not? https://t.co/Wku5QWvebe #pm #projectsmart about 2 hours ago

General Project Management • Re: Software Product Delivery Plan for an Agile project https://t.co/J4vXYDUazj #pm #projectsmart about 2 hours ago

Getting the Most Out of Your Project Planning Sessions https://t.co/DyNPwHyDLm #pmot #projectsmart about 3 hours ago