Exploring trends and developments
in project management today.

Project Smart Logo

Subscribe  Follow Project Smart on Twitter!

Must Project Managers Be Technically Savvy?

By Luc Richard
IT Workers and Project Manager

Must project managers be technically savvy? This topic always seems to cause quite a stir. While some believe that all you need to manage a project is a PMP certification, others are convinced that you can't successfully manage a software development project unless you truly understand the intricacies of the product.

I agree! To be an effective project manager, you must know the ins and outs of your solution. You must be capable of designing and developing the solution yourself.

Here are 5 fundamental project management tasks that project managers can't accomplish unless they have a strong technical background and truly understand the particulars of their product.

Estimating Effort

In order to create a project plan, you must be able to estimate how much effort is required to complete all of the required tasks. Needless to say, you can't estimate effort unless you truly understand what's involved in designing and implementing those features.

Unless you understand what's required to reach 5-9 reliability, you can't assess how much effort is required to achieve this non-functional requirement. Unless you clearly understand how to write Java Server Pages, you can't predict how much development effort is required to transform an HTML prototype to set of fully functional JSP pages.

Scheduling Tasks

Imagine that someone hands you a list of activities that need to be completed for a given project, along with the overall effort. Could you schedule the tasks in a logical sequence? Should the developers start with the presentation, the business, or the data storage layer? Which comes first when working on a presentation layer: the HTML, the JavaScript, the CSS, or the servlets?

A project manager must be able to schedule activities in a logical sequence. If you can't determine which activities must come first and which ones can be done in parallel, you can't put together a project schedule.

Assessing Risk

Imagine the following scenario. Your product is scheduled to be released in 5 days. The QA team discovers a defect in the API through a series of CLI tests. After carefully examining the problem, you realise that you're developers have been working around this defect for months.

Given that you're only 5 days away from releasing your product, should you fix this defect or document the workaround? At this point in time, how risky is it to modify an API that's being used? How confident are you that the developer can fix this API in the given timeframe? What's the likelihood that changing this API will break the modules calling it? Should you fix the defect now, or release the product and address the bug in a patch release?

Unless you've seen the code behind this interface, you can't answer any of these questions yourself. You need to ask your developers. You're not the decision maker. They are.

Participating In Customer Meetings

Customer meetings always end up in technical discussions. Unfortunately, if you can't speak intelligently about your technology, you can't add any value to such meetings. You're not participating; you're strictly listening, and perhaps taking notes. Sooner or later, your customers will find themselves contacting your developers directly. "Why contact the project manager if he can't give me an answer? I may as well go straight to the source."

Ensuring Nothing Falls Through The Cracks

Let's face it. You never get as much time as you'd like to plan your projects. What's important is not that you get it perfect the first time around. What's important is that you can catch the tasks that fell through the cracks before it's too late.

If you don't know what's required to complete your solution, you won't be able to identify all the overlooked activities. They'll either be pointed out by your developers, or simply omitted forever.

In Short...

To be an effective project manager, you must be capable of designing and developing the solution yourself. Otherwise, you have two options. You can either (a) ask others to make decisions for you, or (b) simply pretend you know what you're talking about. In the first case, you're a project co-ordinator. In the second case, you're a project mangler.

Luc Richard holds an MBA with a major in high technology. For the past 10 years, he's been managing the development of software applications. He is the founder of The Project Mangler (http://www.projectmangler.comExternal Link), an online resource that publishes free articles, stories, and other ready-to-use tools to help developers, team leaders and managers deliver software projects on time, according to specs, and within budget.

Comments page 1 of 1
Click here to add a comment
Sodje Oghenerieborue
Posted 3 days ago
I think project management evolved and continuously too, as a result of the gap(s) created by the Techies or technically savvy, managing projects, albeit unsuccessfully. The evolution of the project management discipline, which has brought about increase in the success rates of projects (Standish Group, Chaos Reports) has made project management relevant and increasingly desirable too.
Issac
Posted 363 days ago
Well the article makes sense and is applicable to small projects that can be run by a Tech Savvy PM. Luc Richards article conveys the floor level issues very clearly that every PM faces on a day to day basis. And as Lee says there are loads of flaws in this argument. Both are right from their perspective. The question here is how tech savvy should a project manager be. A little bit of my perspective on Must Project Managers Be Technically Savvy?

A PM should be very (really) strong in the process SDLC, PM processes, and other sub processes (defect, change, risk, issue, SCM, etc..) Project Management is a art by itself, I have seen many tech savvy people taking up project management and (most) ending up being a failure. The art of project management is learned over a period of time.

Learn Professional Project Management by unlearning your view of project management. Hiring Dev, QA, BA, SCM, Tech Writing, Training etc.. Its a huge list of team members you will be interacting with on a daily basis. As a PM you will not have time to get into technical details of the project. Think big, let the spe [beep] t do the job. Yes you do interact with business, but on a different level, only in small companies do you see PM's discussing technical requirements with clients, its not PM's business, its an architects work. As a PM you should work on deliverables, billing, reporting milestones, change management. Don't let your focus loose on getting into technical details.

PM's should have very powerful communication. He should be able to escalate and delegate work as and when it is required. Set up communication expectations. Don't let the project deviate from its scope. As a PM understand the high level requirements of the project. Create a working atmosphere where the team is free to execute a project. That doesn't mean that a newbie can be made as a project manager. My point here is you don't have to be technically savvy to take up the post of a PM. But you need the experience to handle pressure. You need to be respected.

Be smart, active and keep you eyes open and know what is happening all across the project, not poking your nose in design, requirements, cutting estimates just to show that you have been a developer born PM. Instead why don't you create checkpoints, exit criteria and define a process around it.

Richards article works well for newbie companies, but remember that will not be applicable in any of the big projects for any of the points that he has mentioned above. My point here is not defending a technical guy from becoming a project manager. The point here is a PM doesn't need to be a Techno Savvy. I have seen lots of Management Graduates who take this post as a challenge and execute better than a techno savvy PM. This is just a 50000 feet overview of it.
Lee
Posted 422 days ago
Absolute rubbish, the article looks like it was written by a developer who has broken into Project Management. There are so many flaws to this argument I don't kmow where to begin. Whilst I agree that an IT PM needs to have a level of technical knowledge I disagree that he/she should be capable of designing and building the solution. The role of PM is not jujst about delivery, it is about interfacing to the client business, translating tech speak and maintaining control over the delivery. I believe many customers, whilst they would be happy with a technically proficient PM would not feel comfortable with a PM desiging the solution and speaking for an engineer.

Also I fail to see how a PM could encompass the level of technical knowledge required in order to deliver a multi skilled technology project, are we to believe that the only way to sucessfully delivery a project is to have a PM technically adept in Network programming, OS, Java, C#, vendor prioperitary code? Impossible, I know of no one within IT who is able to deliver a multi faceted IT project alone. I regurally deliver CTI project that encompass a mariad technologies and have yet to find a consultant or engineer able to cover all areas with a technical proficiency that would be required for delivery.

Also a key aspects to the PM's role is to question the requirements analysis and tech design, to ascertain that the design meets the requirements, to ask the questions from a business angle, so we don't end up with a technically brilliant solution that no one can use.

Maybe if the project is only centered on a single application using a standard technology, with limited external interfaces, I could agree but in the current climate of clients moving towards full scale application integration this is a very old and somewhat impossible aim.
 

Article Categories

Related Articles

Eight Easy Steps to Managing Your Website Development
Managing your website development need not cause you sleepless nights providing you learn the secrets of successful project management. Perform the best practices in project management and give your project the best chance of success.

Managing IT Projects: Theory or Practice?
What is the best approach for successfully managing IT projects, knowing the theory or applying your experience? This article aims to provide some answers and suggest the best way forward to ensure a successful outcome for your future projects.

9 Steps to a Hassle Free and Effective Software Development Project
Has your company developed entirely new software or added to software already in use throughout the organisation and found the process cumbersome, frustrating, and sometimes not living up to expectations or meeting organisational goals? If so, the solution to a smooth and effective development programme may be as easy as staffing a well-qualified project manager and adopting a proven development process.

Six Rules for Great IT Project Success
Between cost overruns, project delays, unfulfilled expectations and quality control issues, less 30% of IT projects are successful. This is unfortunate because, conducted and delivered well, projects are one of the most powerful ways IT contributes to a company's bottom-line. Use these six rules to get your project back on track today.

21 Ways to Excel at Project Management
The popular project management e-book now fully updated and available as a website for the first time.