Contact Us

Install Toolbar

See Article Categories

Belbin and Successful Project Teams

By Dr. Dirk Jungnickel & Abid Mustafa
Successful Project Team

Creating successful project teams is a daunting task for any project leader, especially when they are pressed to deliver results within aggressive timescales and tight budgetary constraints. Overcoming challenges such as getting the right blend of youth and experience, skills and competencies, academic qualification and professional certifications does not necessarily lead to the establishment of successful project teams.

Building successful project teams is about slotting the right individuals into designated team roles and fostering team spirit. This may sound easy at first, but in time it can become a cumbersome task, especially when project leaders have to choose from a number of highly competent people that can do multiple roles. Selecting individuals on conventional criteria based on experience, skills, qualifications and psychometric tests simply does not work. Alternative mechanisms have to be explored to get the right person for the right role within the team.

One such method of determining the suitability of individuals for team roles is the Belbin Team Inventory Method (BTIM). BTIM is a personality test and evaluates whether the personality of an individual is suitable for a particular role within the team. Based on this, individuals are assigned appropriate Belbin roles to perform. There are eight Belbin roles in a team. These are Plant, Resource Investigator, Co-ordinator, Shaper, Monitor Evaluator, Team Worker, Implementer, Completer Finisher, and Specialist. See Table 1.0 for a brief description.

Belbin Team Role Brief Description
Plant The source of original ideas and proposals. Looking for different approaches. Concerned with major issues. Independent outlook.
Resource Investigator Communicates to and from outside world. Sells ideas to others. Knows lots of people.
Co-ordinator Detached, observes team processes. Absorbs all alternatives and takes the team's decisions. Encourages, soothes conflict.
Shaper Pushy leader shapes team's efforts into a cohesive whole.
Monitor Evaluator Dispassionate analyst. Reaches logical conclusions by analysis. Checks feasibility and practicality.
Team Worker Promotes group harmony. Dampens arguments. Knows others' problems. Counterbalance to friction between Shapers and Plants.
Implementer Translates ideas into concrete tasks and implements them. Clarifies objectives, defines tasks and roles.
Completer Finisher Relentlessly makes the team achieve on time. Raises standards, injects urgency. Compulsive about deadlines.
Specialist Provision of rare skills. Can be called upon to make decisions based on in-depth experience. Advances their own subject.

Table 1.0 Description of Belbin Team Roles

Whilst it is beyond the scope of this article to discuss the profiles of the Belbin roles in detail, it is suffice to mention that leadership roles are Shaper and Coordinator; delivery focused roles are Resource Investigator, Implementer and Completer Finisher; and the cerebral roles are Monitor Evaluator, Plant and Specialist.

How does BTIM work? Individuals within a specified group fill in a Belbin Team Inventory questionnaire. The results are used to establish Belbin profiles for each individual in the team. The two dominant scores correspond to the two Belbin roles that individuals can perform within the current group. A profile is also developed for the group as a whole, which can be used to compare the profile of other groups within the same department or similar projects. See Figure 1.0.

Belbin Profile for a Project Team

Figure 1.0 Belbin Profile for a Project Team

A major advantage of BTIM is that it does not pigeon-hole individuals into particular personality types. Individuals may exhibit different behaviours in different groups and roles and are assigned on the basis of behaviour. This means that the individual can be assigned multiple Belbin roles in various project teams. Additionally, the individual could be assigned a secondary Belbin role within the same team based on the second highest score. For instance, an individual whose daily job is to analyse business requirements takes the Belbin test, and the top two scores from the test correspond to Monitor Evaluator and Shaper respectively. This means that given the right opportunity the individual could also lead a team of business analysts.

BTIM can also highlight unhealthy imbalances in project teams. For instance, a PMO function that exclusively reports on the progress of projects and possesses a significant proportion of Shapers points to a couple of disparities. First, some team members are more suited to leading projects instead of reporting. Second, the PMO team would be better equipped to undertake its role if it was staffed with more Co-ordinators, Team Workers and Implementers.

Such information can prove invaluable to project leaders, as it can help them plug resource gaps on mission critical projects during periods of peak workload. Project leaders can use competent resources that score well via BTIM to perform multiple roles within projects at very little cost to the project.

At a team level BTIM can encourage team members to take on more challenging roles or try something different. For example, someone who has been leading project teams may like to take a step back and try to get a deeper look at problem solving. If the individual’s secondary scores on BTIM for Plant or Monitor Evaluator were high then it would be relatively easy for the person to convince his superiors about this move. The same dynamics can be used to assess the performance of project teams working on similar projects.

In summary, BTIM is a useful tool as it assists individual team members to enhance self awareness and allows them to manage their strengths and weaknesses. For project leaders, BTIM enables them to manage their project teams effectively through placement of the right individuals in the roles they perform best, thereby improving the overall effectiveness of the team and driving higher performance.

About The Authors

Dr. Dirk Jungnickel is an accomplished telecoms specialist whose areas of expertise include: IT, Operations and Project Management. He is currently SVP for Corporate Programme Management and Risk, and Operational Business Intelligence for a leading operator in the MENA region.

Abid Mustafa is a seasoned professional with 18 years' experience in the IT and Telecommunications industry, specialising in enhancing corporate performance through the establishment and operation of executive PMOs and delivering tangible benefits through the management of complex transformation programmes and projects. Currently, he is working as a director of corporate programmes for a leading telecoms operator in the MENA region.

We welcome constructive comments and approve any that meet our guidelines. It means providing helpful information that contributes to an article or discussion.

Comments

No comments yet.

Add Comment

*Required information
(never displayed)
 
1500
What is the sum of 1 + 3 + 3?
 
Enter answer:
 
Notify me of new comments via email.
 
Remember my form inputs on this computer.
 

Article Categories

The Five Stages of Team Development: A Case Study
Every team progresses through five stages of team development. An understanding of these five stages enables a manager to reach a high performing team quickly.

Building Your Project Team
How should you set about choosing people for your project and forming them into a well functioning project team?

Authority Earned, Not Given
For project managers, the support of their team is critical for completing projects successfully. Yet, a team's respect cannot simply be assigned like a task.

Putting People Management Back into Project Management
This article focuses on the communication issues within the project team, in particular, the people management aspect.

Information Icon Common Cost Management Mistakes:

  1. Not understanding what is involved to complete an item of work.
  2. Starting with an amount of money and making the project cost fit it.
  3. Assigning people at more than 80% utilisation.
  4. Failing to build in contingency.
  5. Providing estimates under pressure in project meetings.

Discover our forum where you can ask questions, get advice from other people and share your experience.Speech bubbles